The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Race-Based Redistricting Is a Real Head-Scratcher
Chief Justice John Roberts made a major error in judgment last week in rejecting the State of Alabama’s 2022 congressional redistricting plan in Allen v. Milligan, an error that, as dissenting Justice Samuel Alito says, puts the Voting Rights Act “on a perilous and unfortunate path.”
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Race-Based Redistricting Is a Real Head-Scratcher
Chief Justice John Roberts made a major error in judgment last week in rejecting the State of Alabama’s 2022 congressional redistricting plan in Allen v. Milligan, an error that, as dissenting Justice Samuel Alito says, puts the Voting Rights Act “on a perilous and unfortunate path.”
READ MORE: The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Race-Based Redistricting Is a Real Head-Scratcher | The Heritage Foundation
Share This:
Related Articles
Mobile woman indicted for election fraud — DA: Suspect tried to receive absentee ballot for ‘incapacitated victim’
Family catches unauthorized voting change at Owasso nursing home for dementia patient
Comatose Seniors Illegally Registered to Vote in WI Nursing Homes
Meet the Little-Known Activist Group That Has Tens of Thousands of Doctors Registering Patients To Vote